Conclusion

This document opened by declining to make promises, and it closes the same way.

PURITY's claim is narrow: that the avoidable, structural unfairness of token launches — hidden allocations, discretionary treasuries, insider exits, funding entangled with supply — can be removed by construction, and that what remains afterward is a market whose outcomes, good or bad, reflect demand. The preceding sections have tried to make that claim testable rather than persuasive: every mechanism described here is deployed code, every parameter is public and immutable, every flow is observable on-chain, and every limitation we know about is written down in the previous page rather than left for discovery.

The standard does not predict that fair launches succeed. It predicts only that when a PURITY launch succeeds, no one had to be extracted from for it to happen — and when one fails, it fails cleanly, resolves deterministically, and returns what remains to the people who bore the risk.

Whether that property matters is for markets to decide. The system exists so that the question can be answered by evidence.